#Android ndk 9d install
#Android ndk 9d archive

Assuming the bisect went well, it probably means some of the DX50 may rely on some undefined/undocumented behavior of the print function, I guess when messing up with sysfs. It appears the bad commit is a=commit h=5c96889, which is very surprising. I am going to ignore the tag building bug you mentioned for now, only one problem at a time DX50 NDK-only commit(dbabd0d9c): -> GOOD.Hopefully this should not introduce any (further) bug. I then ran into further configure bugs which means I had to backport some commits. (*) I couldn't compile the expect android toolchain, I had to apply. Here are some builds for you to try and report (*)ĭISCLAIMER: I do not own the device and no nothing about it, I am just helping to bisect Sorry for the long delay, I struggled to actually build for that target. It was all quite a confusing process but I finally arrived Now what? lol

#Android ndk 9d archive

Someone should really archive this file for future developers incase they pull it or better yet upgrade Rockbox to work with NDK 10+. Here is the url I eventually used to get NDK 9d since they no longer post links for older versions.

Moreover it also seems incompatible with anything Android NDK 10+, so you will need to use NDK 9. So either I am entirely useless or you really shouldn't even waste your time with anything but Linux for Rockbox. Still unaware what exactly was wrong I assumed I needed Ubuntu 32-bit, lol Halfway through installing that I finally eureka'd and appended _64 to the 9d NDK url and whammo! Finally built! Took some time to find a url for an older version 9d someone else mentioned using from headfi but I didn't realize the link I found were 32-bit until it complained about not being impressed about 64-bit. Downloaded latest NDK 10e and it would have none of it.

#Android ndk 9d install

Started with 64-bit install and boom cross-compiler no problem. Switched to 32-bit Cygwin and the cross-compiler built but then I struggled with finding an Android NDK that would work with it and no luck there, trying both 9 and 10.įinally decided to just install Ubuntu since it seems everyone else is using that. Started with Cygwin 64-bit, all the packages, again erring out on cross-compiler build complaining about 64-bit something.

Second I thought, having already a Win8 parallels VM for work I would just fire up Cygwin. First I tried the Mac with proper gcc and all required packages (using MacPorts) and it failed to build the cross-compiler with a ton of fundamental issues that would have required me to go back to some ancient version of gcc perhaps, no thanks.